<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>physics on Harlan D. Harris</title>
    <link>https://www.harlan.harris.name/tags/physics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in physics on Harlan D. Harris</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <managingEditor>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.harlan.harris.name/tags/physics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Are Black Holes the Answer to Dark Matter and Dark Energy?</title>
      <link>https://www.harlan.harris.name/2026/04/black-holes-dark-matter-dark-energy/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author>
      <guid>https://www.harlan.harris.name/2026/04/black-holes-dark-matter-dark-energy/</guid>
      <description>
        
          
            This post is a little different. I have a layperson&#39;s/nerd&#39;s interest in cosmology and physics, and have tried to read a few books about current research. Recently, I ran across some new work suggesting a pretty radical shift in theory. Not finding a great summary for the non-physicist reader, I had Google Gemini write one for me, in the style of pop-science journalism like Science News. The result, below, is 90% AI&#39;s writing, unlike most of what I write these days.
          
          
        
      </description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
